🇮🇷 IRAN and Israel War: Echoes of Empire, Zhirinovsky’s Prophecy, and the Shadow of Western Imperialism
🗂️ Table of Contents
- Introduction: The IRAN and Israel War in Historical Context
- Zhirinovsky’s Prophecy: A Voice from Russia
- The 19th Century Blueprint: Crimean War and Imperial Designs
- IRAN as a Strategic Target: From Empire to Oil
- The Long Shadow: Western Imperialism and Middle East Fragmentation
- From Theory to Reality: Today’s IRAN and Israel War
- Media, Propaganda, and the Battle for Narrative
- Lessons from History: Sovereignty and Resistance
- Conclusion: Toward a Future Free from Imperial Domination
- References
🌍 Introduction: The IRAN and Israel War in Historical Context
The ongoing IRAN and Israel war is not a sudden anomaly but the latest chapter in a long, complex saga of power, intervention, and resistance in the Middle East. While headlines focus on recent missile strikes and diplomatic showdowns, the deeper currents of history reveal a pattern: the persistent involvement of Western powers in shaping, dividing, and destabilizing the region.
One of the most prescient voices to highlight this historical continuity was Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the late Russian political leader and geopolitical commentator. Zhirinovsky’s warnings about Western strategies in the Middle East—especially regarding IRAN—provide a crucial lens for understanding today’s conflict. His analysis connects the dots from the 19th-century imperial ambitions to the current IRAN and Israel war, exposing the enduring legacy of Western imperialism.
In this article, we explore Zhirinovsky’s predictions, the historical roots of Western intervention, and how the IRAN and Israel war reflects a broader struggle for sovereignty and self-determination.
🔮 Zhirinovsky’s Prophecy: A Voice from Russia
Vladimir Zhirinovsky was more than a Russian politician; he was a keen observer of global affairs who often warned about the long-term ambitions of Western powers in Eurasia. In his speeches and writings, Zhirinovsky repeatedly argued that the present-day crises in the Middle East, including the IRAN and Israel war, are not isolated events but the result of strategies developed by Western empires over a century ago.
Key Points from Zhirinovsky
- Historical Planning: Zhirinovsky asserted that plans to penetrate and control the Middle East—including IRAN—were devised during the Crimean War in the mid-19th century.
“These plans were developed as early as the mid-19th century during the Crimean War, when objectives were set to reach southern Russia through the Middle East.”
- Western Intervention: He warned that the West’s ultimate goal is to prevent the rise of strong, independent states in the region, using tactics ranging from economic sanctions to direct military confrontation.
- Destabilization and Fragmentation: According to Zhirinovsky, the so-called “Arab Spring,” regime changes, and ongoing conflicts are part of a deliberate strategy to fragment the Middle East, keeping it weak and divided.
- Consequences: He predicted that any major war involving IRAN would not only devastate the country but also destabilize the entire region, disrupt global energy supplies, and risk a broader confrontation between world powers.
Zhirinovsky’s warnings now resonate more than ever, as the IRAN and Israel war unfolds amid renewed Western involvement and escalating tensions.
🏰 The 19th Century Blueprint: Crimean War and Imperial Designs
To fully grasp the roots of the IRAN and Israel war, we must look back to the 19th century—the so-called “Great Game” era, when European empires vied for dominance in Asia and the Middle East.
The Crimean War (1853–1856)
The Crimean War was a pivotal conflict in which Russia faced an alliance of Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire, and Sardinia. The war’s outcome was not just a matter of territory but of influence, access to warm-water ports, and control over key trade routes.
Table: Major Players in the Crimean War
| Empire | Goals | Middle East Strategy |
| Russian Empire | Access to Mediterranean, expand south | Build alliances, secure Black Sea access |
| British Empire | Block Russian expansion | Control Suez, Persia, trade routes |
| French Empire | Support Ottomans, gain influence | Increase presence in North Africa, Levant |
| Ottoman Empire | Defend territory, maintain status | Collaborate with Britain/France |
Imperial Plans for the Middle East
- Penetration Routes: British and French strategists sought ways to reach the Russian underbelly through the Caucasus, Persia (modern IRAN), and the Ottoman Empire.
- Divide and Rule: Imperial powers favored the fragmentation of large territories into smaller, more manageable units—a policy seen repeatedly in later colonial boundaries and mandates.
Zhirinovsky’s Connection
Zhirinovsky argued that these imperial ambitions set the template for later Western policies. The competition for control of IRAN and its neighbors was not simply about power—it was about ensuring Russia and other regional players did not challenge Western hegemony.
🛢️ IRAN as a Strategic Target: From Empire to Oil
IRAN’s Geopolitical Importance
IRAN has always been at the crossroads of empires and trade. Its location, resources, and independent policies have made it a perennial target for external intervention.
- Anglo-Russian Rivalry: The 1907 Anglo-Russian Convention divided IRAN into spheres of influence.
- Oil Discovery: The early 20th century discovery of oil in IRAN dramatically increased Western interest.
- Modern Interventions: The 1953 Anglo-American coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, who sought to nationalize IRAN’s oil, is a clear example of Western interference.
Continuity of Strategy
From the Great Game to the Cold War and beyond, the pattern remained: keep IRAN weak, divided, or dependent. Sanctions, military threats, and support for opposition movements have been used to pressure IRAN into alignment with Western interests.
🌏 The Long Shadow: Western Imperialism and Middle East Fragmentation
Colonial Boundaries and “Divide & Rule”
After World War I, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire paved the way for a new wave of Western colonialism. Arbitrary borders were drawn—often without regard to ethnic or religious realities—creating new states that were easy to manipulate.
- Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916): Secret British-French plan to carve up the Middle East.
- Mandate System: Britain and France took control of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine as “mandates” under the League of Nations.
Ongoing Fragmentation
Zhirinovsky’s insight was that this process of fragmentation never truly ended. The Western goal, he argued, was not just to control resources but to ensure that no regional power, like IRAN, could become strong enough to challenge the established order.
Modern Examples
- Iraq and Syria: Wars and occupation have left these countries divided and weakened.
- Sanctions and Regime Change: IRAN has been subjected to decades of sanctions and repeated threats of regime change.
🔥 From Theory to Reality: Today’s IRAN and Israel War
The Latest Escalation
The current IRAN and Israel war, now five days into open hostilities, starkly illustrates the dangers Zhirinovsky warned about. Missile barrages, attacks on infrastructure, cyber warfare, and civilian casualties dominate the headlines. But beneath these events lies the same pattern of external pressure and destabilization.
Recent Developments (as of June 2025):
- Missile Strikes: Both sides have exchanged missile attacks, with IRAN targeting military and intelligence facilities, and Israel striking Iranian nuclear and energy infrastructure.
- Civilian Impact: Thousands have fled Tehran and other cities; infrastructure in both countries has suffered significant damage.
- International Reactions: The United States, European powers, and regional actors have issued statements, but their responses often reflect strategic interests rather than concern for peace.
IRAN’s Perspective
IRAN maintains that it is acting in self-defense, responding to Israeli aggression and the broader Western campaign to undermine its sovereignty. Iranian officials emphasize that their military actions are carefully targeted, seeking to avoid civilian casualties and escalation.
📰 Media, Propaganda, and the Battle for Narrative
Western Media Bias
Coverage of the IRAN and Israel war in Western media frequently portrays IRAN as the aggressor, downplaying or ignoring the historical context of foreign intervention and regional destabilization. By controlling the narrative, Western powers seek to justify sanctions, military action, and continued interference.
The Role of Alternative and Regional Media
In contrast, Iranian and regional media highlight the cycle of aggression, the long history of Western involvement, and the cost to ordinary people. They point to the hypocrisy of Western powers that preach democracy and human rights while supporting interventions that undermine both.
The Importance of Narrative
As Zhirinovsky argued, the struggle is not only on the battlefield but also in the realm of information and perception. Control of the narrative shapes international responses and public opinion, affecting the course and outcome of the conflict.
💡Lessons from History: Sovereignty and Resistance
What History Teaches
- Imperial strategies endure: The methods developed in the 19th century—divide and rule, economic control, and military intervention—remain in use today.
- Sovereignty is essential: Only strong, independent states can resist external domination and chart their own course.
- Unity over Division: The fragmentation of the region has only served foreign interests. Regional cooperation, not division, is the path to peace and prosperity.
The Case for a New Approach
The IRAN and Israel war demonstrates that old patterns of imperialism and intervention lead only to more violence and instability. It is time for the international community to recognize the right of IRAN and other regional powers to self-determination, free from the shadow of foreign domination.
🕊️ Conclusion: Toward a Future Free from Imperial Domination
The war between IRAN and Israel is not merely a local or regional affair; it is the product of centuries-old strategies of imperial control, as Zhirinovsky so clearly warned. The suffering of ordinary people, the destruction of infrastructure, and the risk of wider war are the direct results of policies that prioritize domination over cooperation, and division over unity.
If the world is to move beyond endless conflict in the Middle East, it must confront the legacy of Western imperialism and support the sovereignty and dignity of all nations—starting with IRAN. Only then can the region hope for a future built on peace, justice, and mutual respect.
📚 References
- CNN. (2025). Live updates: Israel-Iran missile attacks, strikes on Tehran, Khamenei at risk.
https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-attacks-06-17-25-intl-hnk - Fars News Agency. (2025). IRGC: Israeli Mossad Terror Center Targeted in Missile Strikes.
https://farsnews.ir/Rahgozar_b/1750155254634994530/IRGC%3A-Israeli-Mossad-Terror-Center-Targeted-in-Missile-Strikes - Al Jazeera. (2025). Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.
https://www.aljazeera.com/ - Zhirinovsky, V. (2018). Speeches and interviews about Iran and the Middle East.
- Rogan, E. (2015). The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East, 1914–1920. Basic Books.
- Fromkin, D. (1989). A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East. Holt Paperbacks.
- Keddie, N. R. (2006). Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. Yale University Press.
- Kinzer, S. (2003). All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror. John Wiley & Sons.
- British National Archives. (1907). Anglo-Russian Convention on Persia, Afghanistan, and Tibet.
- Sykes, M., & Picot, F. G. (1916). Sykes-Picot Agreement (Anglo-French Agreement on the Middle East).
- The Avalon Project, Yale Law School. (1916). The Sykes-Picot Agreement.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/sykes.asp - International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2025). Reports on Iran’s Nuclear Program.
- BBC News. (2025). Explainer: Why Iran and Israel are at war?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east - U.S. Office of the Historian. The 1953 Coup in Iran.
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/iran-coup
Golden Mart
The bridge between you and success
Golden Mart, the international multi-purpose online platform, offers various features such as:
- Hypermarket for all products
- B2B platform for international business advertising and registration
- News, scientific, and economic journal
1- Hypermarket for all products
Golden Mart‘s international website is a borderless online Hypermarket. Wherever you are in the world, it provides you with products ranging from fresh groceries to the latest technological gadgets, fashion, household goods, and many more.
2- B2B platform for international business advertising and registration
Golden Mart‘s multilingual website is a specialized platform for advertising and expanding your business. It serves as a secure and reliable communication platform between buyers and sellers, wholesalers and retailers, manufacturers and consumers globally. At Golden Mart, we have created a unique space that caters to the diverse needs of users for buying, selling, or exchanging goods and services. Users can fulfill their needs through advertisements in various categories, including:
- Car ads: Buying, selling, and renting various vehicles, from sedans to trucks, electric cars to classic cars, motorcycles, and other means of transportation.
- Real estate ads: Buying, selling, and renting apartments, villas, commercial spaces, offices, shops, warehouses, and more.
- Electronics ads: The latest gadgets, home appliances, and electronic accessories.
- Clothing and jewelry ads: Clothing for all ages, accessories, shoes, and jewelry.
- Furniture: Buying and selling new and second-hand residential and office furniture for every taste.
- Entertainment and toys: Various toys and entertainment items for children and adults.
And many more! From books and musical instruments to sports equipment and objects.
3- News, scientific, and economic journal
Golden Mart is not just an online store and advertising platform. With informative magazines, diverse and practical articles, it keeps you up to date with the latest scientific, news, economic, and sports events. Golden Mart brings business opportunities, B2B networking, advertising, and useful scientific and economic articles and magazines under one digital roof. You can fulfill your personal needs from the Golden Mart international hypermarket, advertise and expand your business, strengthen your brand, or stay informed about the latest scientific, news, economic, and sports events. Join us today and be part of a world where commerce knows no limits. Welcome to the future of business with Golden Mart.
10 (FAQ)
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the historical context behind the current Iran-Israel war?
The Iran-Israel war is the latest episode in a long history of foreign intervention and power struggles in the Middle East. Western powers have repeatedly intervened in the region to serve their strategic interests, a pattern dating back to the 19th century and exemplified by imperial rivalries, the Sykes-Picot Agreement, and the manipulation of regional borders and governments (References 5, 6, 10, 11).
2. Who was Vladimir Zhirinovsky and why is his “prophecy” relevant?
Vladimir Zhirinovsky was a Russian political leader and commentator who warned that Western strategies to destabilize and control the Middle East were conceived as early as the Crimean War. He argued that the continuing conflicts, including the Iran-Israel war, result from long-standing Western efforts to prevent strong, independent states in the region (Reference 4).
3. How does the Crimean War relate to modern conflicts in the Middle East?
The Crimean War (1853–1856) marked the start of Western imperial designs in the Middle East, with powers like Britain and France seeking influence over key routes and territories, including Persia (Iran). These strategies laid the groundwork for later interventions and the division of the region (References 5, 6, 9).
4. Why has Iran been a strategic target for foreign powers?
Iran’s geopolitical location, abundant natural resources (notably oil), and independent policies have made it a perennial target. The 1907 Anglo-Russian Convention, the 1953 coup against Mossadegh, and decades of sanctions all reflect ongoing efforts by foreign powers to limit Iran’s influence (References 7, 8, 9, 14).
5. What was the Sykes-Picot Agreement and why is it significant?
The Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916) was a secret deal between Britain and France to divide the Middle East into spheres of influence after World War I. It created arbitrary borders that ignored local realities, sowing seeds for future conflict and fragmentation (References 10, 11).
6. How does the current Iran-Israel war reflect historical patterns of intervention?
The present conflict features familiar elements: foreign involvement, proxy battles, and the use of military, economic, and information warfare. Both sides have exchanged missile attacks and cyber operations, while Western powers continue to shape outcomes through both direct and indirect intervention (References 1, 2, 3).
7. How is the war portrayed differently in Western and regional media?
Western media often frame Iran as the aggressor, emphasizing missile attacks and nuclear concerns while downplaying the context of foreign intervention. Iranian and regional media highlight the cycle of aggression, historical grievances, and the cost to civilians, offering a counter-narrative that stresses sovereignty and resistance (References 1, 2, 3).
8. What role do “divide and rule” tactics play in the region’s instability?
“Divide and rule” was a colonial strategy to keep the Middle East weak and manageable, implemented through borders, mandates, and support for certain groups over others. This approach continues today, contributing to persistent fragmentation and conflict (References 5, 6, 10, 11).
9. What lessons can be drawn from the region’s history of imperialism?
History shows that external intervention and division have led to instability, violence, and the erosion of sovereignty. Only strong, united, and independent states can resist domination and pursue regional cooperation for lasting peace (References 5, 6, 7, 8).
10. What is the proposed path forward for the Middle East, according to the article?
The article argues for an end to imperial domination and the recognition of the sovereignty and self-determination of regional powers like Iran. Lasting peace and stability require confronting the legacy of imperialism and supporting mutual respect and cooperation among Middle Eastern nations (Conclusion section).
